Review of my 2025

That should do it for 2025. Let's have a look how it went.

2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024

How Was 2025?

What a busy year! Or at least busy everywhere except for my blog. Over the course of this year, the blog earned itself 24.2K views, and I made incredible 42 blog posts on it. While that is the highest number of blog posts I've had on the blog in any year so far, I have to also caution that 31 of them were made as part of the Character March challenge. Outside of that, I made no blog posts throughout May and all months from July until November. Let's see how my resolutions went!

Resolutions from 2025

My goal for this year was to make 12 to 25 Things. I ended up making 45, so I won't be listing them all here. Instead, I'm gonna list some goals I am most proud of.

Public TTRPG Presentations. I made two public appearances to speak about TTRPGs in two of the biggest cities in my country. As part of one of these, I was also a Game Master on stage for a session that was played live in front of an audience.

Videos and Streams. I made five videos and three streams during my previous year. Not a bad start, but I should do more stuff like this. Despite all the views my blog gets, it gets zero interactions, so I hardly feel like anyone really reads this stuff.

Daily Drawings. I drew every day for seven of 2025's twelve months. While I can't say my art is amazing, it most certainly improved as the year went on. The total amount of daily drawings is 228.

Published TTRPGs. I published a total of 11 TTRPGs, or updates to existing TTRPGs, last year. The longest of them, Pirate Sea, took an entire month and a team of three people to develop. Some of them were short, but they also have companion videos as a compensation.

Hopes and Goals for 2025

I want more variety next year. Last year's few goals worked out for me, I got done so much, this year I think I could try to go for more than that. I'll try to keep my goals brief.

• Stream 12 times
• Publish 12 videos
• Make 12 Things*
• Lose 12 kilograms
• GM 52 TTRPG sessions

* Streams and videos don't count as Things for the sake of this, and I am discontinuing counting monthly things as two Things. It was nice while it lasted, but let's be real here - doing something for an entire month drained me of a lot of energy, even if it took little to no time. I am still recovering from developing that pirate game.

As for the GMing of 52 sessions, I'm going to include solo games. I started playing one with a good friend of mine shortly after Christmas, so I'm hoping it's gonna be played for 52 days at least, and if it is finished by that point, we'll try to start another one.

Ideally, I'd finish all five of these items, but if I'm going to be realistic about it, fewer are more likely gonna be the case. I'm not gonna be unhappy if I finish four, or three, or even just a single one. I'm just gonna do what I can without attaching yet another number to it.

Thank you for reading! Have a happy New Year 2026, a great century, and may your resolutions too come true!

Core Resolution of Dice as Difficulty

It's been a while since I made an article. I had two ready since June, but I've had hardly any time to stop for a while now. I'm just gonna spill this thought out of my head without making it a game. Welcome to CRoDaD.

Core Resolution of Dice as Difficulty

The premise is simple: It's a roll under system, except the die you roll is determined by the difficulty of the task at hand. The difficulties are: Trivial (d4), Medium (d8), Hard (d12), Arduous (d16), Unfeasible (d20). Yes, I know d16 isn't common, you could drop it if you feel like it.

Example: The player character approaches the guards, wishing to enter the castle. The guards won't allow anyone in. The player states they wish to convince them. The GM judges the difficulty to be Arduous, so the player rolls a 1d16 and tries to get a roll under.

But Why?

I was in part inspired by the video from Tales from Elsewhere about fudging. I figured I'd try my hand at coming up with a core resolution that fulfills two requirements:

• Transparency. The player could calculate the odds of success before making the roll.
• GM Dependent. The player can't just make the roll, resolve it on their own, and announce the result before the GM says they get to do that.

Can the first one be solved by the GM saying "The DC is this"? Yes, but the GM doesn't have to do it in most cases. Can the second one be solved by proper tabletop etiquette? Yes, but I wanted to do a thought experiment here.

This is why it's designed like a box with two locks - you can't open it until both parties do their part. The GM has to say what die is getting rolled for this, and the player has to make the die roll.

Design of All Things Considered

Is it still May? Good. I don't have much time, June will start soon, and I just realized I didn't write an article here all month long. Could I just live with it and have May 2025 be skipped by this blog? Yes. Will I allow this? I suppose we'll see within three hours from the moment I started writing.

Cover Art Details: It's a riff on the Three Card Monte. Left to right, the characters represent a King of Spades, a Queen of Diamonds, and a King of Clubs. Since the Three Card Monte is usually about distracting the viewer with enough motions to confuse them, the idea here is that the Queen of Diamonds is distracting the onlookers while the Kings do their job in the shadows. Considering I've had at least one person comment exclusively on the Queen and not on the Kings, she's doing a fine job.
Art commissioned from Geo K.

All Things Considered

Those who know me are well aware of the fact that I enjoy the Now You See Me movies a lot. A group of magicians performing various incredible feats for the good of people against the powerful elites of the world. What's not to love?

This project started when I signed up for Scribble's Random Resolution Jam. The only condition for participating in it is to randomly roll for the resolution (as the name of the jam suggests), and then build a game around that. I will admit here, though, that I rerolled my result twice. The reason for that was that I had already made games with those resolution mechanics. The dexterity test is present in Fae King, a game I did very recently, while the strength-based resolution was done in Porters' Journeys, which might be old. Still, I didn't really feel like making another game about exercising. The third roll is what I accepted, though: dice-as-character-sheet, 5d6.

I dabbled with several concepts, some of which I might do in the future, so I'll keep them to myself for now. Eventually, I settled on "magicians doing cool stuff". The premise behind 5d6 used as a character sheet is, as far as I understood it, that you don't need a character sheet. Or, that would be theory. In practice, you'd need to make modular dice for this, each of which would have sides big enough to fit in all the rules. And I doubt anyone would do that with dice sized like regular playing dice. In our world, you'd likely need 5d6 and a character sheet that lists your Aspects.

Now, each magician in my game is defined by a selection of five Aspects from the following categories:

• Crew - magicians' assistants,
• Role - who you are within the team,
• Props - items that you use with your hands and would usually belong to a magician's show,
• Tools - items that you use with your hands and aren't typically seen at a magician's show,
• and Gear, equipment that's worn and would usually help with a magician's show.

How do we turn this into a 5d6 dice pool? Simply put, we roll all the Aspects' dice, read out which ones succeed, and which ones we just can't do right now, and only then do we pick out which actions we pursue. A default Aspect die has three Blank sides that mean you were too slow to act, but get a chance to improve the die after the mission, two Effect sides that do some basic stuff, and one Flourish side that does an extra good outcome. As you progress, you swap out Blank sides for Effects, and Effects for Flourishes. That being said, to do this, you must roll and select a Blank side. So, the best possible Aspect die you can have is one with four Effect and two Flourish sides, after which point you can't improve it anymore.

Two key mechanics to talk about are Prepare and Distraction. Prepared Aspect's die can be rolled twice, keeping the better result, but you can only prepare one, and this must be done when nobody is watching. Distracting makes people watch you or whatever you use for distraction, letting others prepare.

As for effects that can affect a player negatively: Heat will make your character more recognizable, Wounds limit how many Aspect dice you can roll, and Restraints prevent you from taking actions other than trying to free yourself.

Beyond the missions, the game needed something to do in the spare time. For that, I came up with what I called Networks. Inspired by Slugblaster, each Network provides a player with a simple storyline to play out between the missions, with several story beats. In the end, the player gets a choice to make that defines their character a little more, and as a reward, they will get a Knack - a simple ability that improves their character one way or another.

With all this, I also included plenty of GM guidelines on how to run the game, including example storybeats for the networks and obstacles they could use in a mission. Finally, there are random roll tables for things like names, magician outfits, and some other details too.

Look at the time, it's past midnight already. I could cheat and publish the post saying it's published on May 31st, one minute before midnight, ... but I'll keep it honest. I missed my mark, and that happens sometimes. Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!

The Four Scales of Playstyle Evaluation

Nearly two years have passed since my first public attempt at a music band TTRPG. At first, I joked that it would be included in the Runehack as a new focus of the system in the April Fools post a year ago, ... and then I did it anyway. Well, kind of. These rules are included in the Seeker minigame of the Jobs pillar of experience.

Why am I talking about my games when I promised you with the title that I'd discuss the playstyle evaluation? Because the four stats used for the musical performances (as well as other creative performances) could be used to evaluate a group's playstyle, with a bit of interpretation here and there. Let's have a look!

Look, two people playing a board game! That counts as relevant art, right?
Promotional art from the Cavern Tavern Kickstarter. I'm in no way affiliated with them, I just needed an artpiece for the article, so in exchange, they get a tiny bit of free advertising on a blog barely anyone reads.

Intensity - Difficulty

How hard is your game? This stat required some reinterpretation, since "loudness" or "physical strength" don't make sense in most TTRPGs. Low intensity means you're playing a casual, non-difficult game, while a high intensity game suggests that players have to optimize their characters and play smart to succeed.

Tempo - ... this one's self-explanatory

How fast do you want your game to proceed? Low tempo stands for a slow game, where everyone takes their time with things, be it by processing them emotionally or mentally. A fast tempo represents a game in which stuff happens. Bear in mind, this doesn't suggest that every fast tempo game is a speedrun and every slow tempo game is a still life. Games in general should have their fast and slow moments. This only discusses their frequency.

Authenticity - Emotional Depth

How emotional do you want your game to be? Low authenticity game is there just to amuse the players, with jokes and humorous happenings, and cool moments. High authenticity game is a game that tries to evoke more emotions in the players: sadness, fury, fear, perhaps even awe.

Creativity - Adherence to the Rules

How much do you stray from the rules? This one's simple - low creativity means RAW/RAI is preferred, resorting to house rules and rulings only when necessary, while high creativity games are full of rulings, Rule of Cool, house rules, and homebrew.

Important note: A good game can exist on either end of these scales. No, you are not any worse for enjoying a "low authenticity low creativity" game, and you are not cool just because you are into a "high intensity high tempo high authenticity high creativity" game.

While these scales talk about playstyles mainly, some rulesets lean towards supporting one end of the spectrum over another. A difficult game leans more to the high Intensity playstyle. A crunchy game will have a hard time being played at a high Tempo (or so I assume). And a soup stone game would probably suck without high Creativity, since that's what makes it good.

Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!

THE Soup Stone RPG

Time for another experimental game. Definitely not a joke I've heard a hundred times by now.

THE Soup Stone RPG

Every problem you try to solve can be solved by making a proper meal.

Your stats are listed below. Distribute 36 points among them (minimum 2, maximum 12).

• Filling. A filling meal can give you tons of energy, which helps you in speed and endurance.
• Stylish. Good-looking meals are good for your creativity.
• Tasty. A tasty meal is good for your mind. This makes you more sociable.
• Healthy. A healthy body means you're gonna move well, therefore, this is good for physical matters such as strength and agility.
• Digestible. Your body doesn't need to focus on digestion, therefore, this is good for smarts.

Whenever you attempt something relevant to the stat, roll 1d12. You succeed on a roll less than the stat (not equal).

When you attempt to make a meal, roll 5d12 and distribute them among the stats. Each roll that's less than your stat successfully causes that quality to manifest within the meal. If more characters are cooking the same meal, they may choose to roll fewer d12's and then select which stats they contribute with for the final meal. Why choose fewer? Because too many cooks will spoil the soup - if two or more characters contribute with a success in the same quality, it's considered a failure.

Different characters might require different qualities, and the players will have to guess which ones exactly based on the characterization of NPCs provided by the GM through role-play.

Woohoo, the soup stone game is finally out. It's a rushed job done mostly within the last 10 minutes of the April Fools, but it's something.

Character March 2025: A Modest Life

Would you look at that, this is the final Character March 2025 article. It was a nice journey, and it caused my blog's number of blog posts to already soar beyond what I did in any previous year. 

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

A Modest Life

Zarah Millermann used to be a scout in her earlier days. Wandering the wilderness, navigating the group, watching over the party at night, all of this and so much more was all she used to do. But that was well over thirty years ago. At the moment, she's an old woman who lives in the Hiddenburg village, on a random road that's rarely even traveled anymore. Her form is a little hunched by now, her hair has lost its vibrant brown color a long time ago, now replaced with grays, and nowadays she works as a forager: looking for herbs and fruits in the forest still reminds her of the old adventuring days. The village appreciates it, especially the kids with whom she likes to share sweet forest berries.

Zarah is now 66 years old. Her stats are as follows:

• Tough 12
• Agile 16
• Wise 18
• Sharp 20

Her special abilities (a number of them equal to her age divided by 10, rounded down, so 6) are:

• Finder. If she asks the GM if there's a hidden item nearby, they'll reveal any that is.
• Lurker. She can be hidden if she does not move on her turn.
• Navigator. She can't get lost and always knows her way back home.
• Nightwatch. She can see well enough even in the pitch darkness.
• Sampler. She can tell through close examination if a food is harmful and how.
• Tracker. She can identify what the tracks mean and can't lose them after finding them.

Nowadays, Zarah brings forest's gifts and plenty of joy to the Hiddenburg village. But who knows how much longer this will last... her clock is ticking. Her body isn't what it used to be. And with every passing year, the chance that this was her last year grows. Who will replace her when she finally moves on to the other side?

Ratings

5/5 RPG. It might be a recency bias, but I think has a feeling different than just a procedure or a board game.

3/5 Soup Stone. I could imagine expanding on the game, but I think it does decent enough in this regard.

3/5 Would I Play. I'd like to see how this works in practice, but I'm not particularly driven to pick this system over others, at least not for now.

2/5 Would I Write. If I see a meaningful way to grow these rules, sure! I didn't publish it on itch.io yet because I think it still needs a little something, illustrations especially, but I'm not counting that into the rating because I'm just busy at the moment.

13/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: It's About Time

This one was made by a buddy of mine for a convention as a short game to hand out to people present to learn playing TTRPGs. It spans two pages, and it's largely based on Lasers and Feelings. I helped him by pitching ideas, playtesting the game with him, and offering guidance here and there, so since I ran out of games where I could have a character, I'm gonna count it.

A small note before I continue: The game was originally written in Slovak, and there isn't an English-translated version yet (at least not one I'm aware of), so I'll just be translating stuff I use to English for this article.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

It's About Time

Bella Minds is a cyborg psychologist. Half of her body is machine; the other half is an average-looking human with black hair and a piercing gaze. In the time that's present to her, she usually walks around in a white lab coat because of the subtle psychological effect of authority it has on people. Her pick of time travel ability is Echo, which allows her to create a copy of herself (probably by bringing one from the future) for one minute. As all other time travelers in this game, she comes equipped with some futuristic equipment befitting a psychologist, such as a tablet with every single Rorschach inkblot, the latest edition of the DSM, a hefty bottle of placebo pills, and so on. As for her personal goal, she wants to uncover something secret whenever she travels to the past.

Ratings

5/5 RPG. Plays like an RPG, I'd have a hard time treating this as a board game.

3/5 Soup Stone. Plenty of ideas are pitched by the game, so that's pretty good.

2/5 Would I Play. Perhaps when I have an incomplete group, or when a bunch of new players wants to try out some wacky time travel stuff.

1/5 Would I Write. Only if I had ideas on how to meaningfully expand on it myself, and I don't have any right now.

11/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: There Is No Tomorrow

... the time has come for the loop. And in the loop, the time has come for the loop. And in the loop, ...

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

There Is No Tomorrow

Felipe Contreras is an average surgeon. He's a little impatient when tending to things outside of his work, but he's also very much a people person. This contrasts the big city he lives in, where the people barely care about one another as they walk the streets. Still, he's got a few close friends that he meets now and then, like his drinking buddies, his girlfriend, and some of his family members who haven't moved out yet. His attributes are as follows:

• Strength +1
• Endurance +2
• Agility +3
• Talent +5
• Knowledge +4
• Intuition +0

Ratings

5/5 RPG. It can't really be played another way.

3/5 Soup Stone. While it leaves a lot of details blank due to its Mosaic Strict format, I think it still has a decent amount of details and time loop tropes to earn a 3.

4/5 Would I Play. I like a good time loop.

1/5 Would I Write. It feels complete to me. If I come up with a meaningful way to expand on it, I will.

13/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Match Two

Uber short!

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Match Two

Annie Loveheart is determined to make the couple fall in love with her trusty Beauty Mask.

Ratings

4/5 RPG. Plenty of space to improvise.

1/5 Soup Stone. Very little detail to work with.

2/5 Would I Play. With the right group of people, maybe.

1/5 Would I Write. Only if I were to start over.

8/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: MARSsacre

Should I use the same tone in this article? ... nah, let's not.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

MARSsacre

Chell Shotgun is a femme fatale in the manly culture of the Slayers. She's no stranger to being violent though, since she's got her hands on both an Atomizer, and a Jackhammer. Her Humanity starts at 5, and I can't give further details on her until her first mission, so that's all!

Ratings

2/5 RPG. Most of it is shooty stuff, though some roleplaying is encouraged to regain your humanity.

4/5 Soup Stone. Thematically strong, I think it's okay to rate this at a 4.

3/5 Would I Play. Maybe one day. It's low on my priorities list, but it sounds kind of neat.

2/5 Would I Write. Kind of? Depends on what I'd expand it with.

11/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Descent of the Holy

Let's make a priest.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Descent of the Holy

Father Maksymilian is a dwarven priest who's helping out the community of the Good City. Whether it's helping with the problems of people on the surface, or delving underground to fight off the vicious skeletal forces, he's always on the ready, and quick with a joke. His Faith begins at 1, as it does for all the characters. When delving into the crypt below, his carried equipment of choice is Aspergillum for when it's needed, and a Relic since one of the priests has to bring it. The first prayer he learns from the options listed in the game is Douse the Multitude, a prayer that allows him to regain 1 Aspergillum use after two uses. His stats are as follows:

• Fairness 1d6
• Altruism 1d16
• Courage 1d8
• Temperance 1d10
• Sin 1d4

Ratings

3/5 RPG. I think there's space for stuff that would make it different from a board game.

4/5 Soup Stone. Plenty is already there to work with.

3/5 Would I Play. Maybe one day if I feel like it. Maybe a oneshot? Who knows.

3/5 Would I Write. If I get some ideas for improvements, I could see myself updating this. Until then, this will have to wait patiently for its turn.

13/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Your Royal Slyness

This one will hurt me since it's probably the published product I disliked the most out of my itch.io products yet. If I remove games from there, this one might go first.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Your Royal Slyness

Drew Ace of Clubs and a King of Spades. I guess I'm the Monarch.

King Patriclus XII is the head monarch of the Wornall Kingdom. He starts the game off with 4 Secrets and 4 Rumors, and his secret motive is to Silence (or perhaps Kill) a Foreign Monarch, perhaps the ruler of a neighboring kingdom.

Now then, let's create some secrets and rumors!

• Secret: His men stole a valuable treasure from the neighboring kingdom.
• Secret: He seduced one of his servants several times.
• Secret: He ordered his men to smear the other king in his own kingdom.
• Secret: The actual Patriclus XII is dead, this is Hyacinthus impersonating his older brother.
• Rumor: He cheated on his wife.
• Rumor: He poisoned his wife several times.
• Rumor: He poisoned the king of the neighboring kingdom.
• Rumor: He dabbles in witchcraft with a secret coven of his maid-witches.

Ratings

1/5 RPG. You could put roleplaying in there. But it feels like a board game through and through.

1/5 Soup Stone. I feel like it doesn't give you nearly enough to work with, though I might be biased.

0/5 Would I Play. I don't think so. I literally don't even feel like reading it.

0/5 Would I Write. Only if I completely overhauled the game.

2/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: The Hungering End

This is the last of my systems that I posted on the blog. From now on, I'll need to go through the games I've posted on my itch.io. Once I run out of those, ... who knows?

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

The Hungering End

Lord Charles Nevermoor is the head of the noble family. He's a stern man who knows what this is about: the world is slowly ending. Whether he'll manage to get his family to behave and save the world from The Hungering End is something nobody can tell for sure.

His resource is Will, which he can spend to draw extra cards during the challenges. Furthermore, all his cards drawn get a +3 bonus to them. Both of these are relevant only within a challenge. I don't feel like going into details on what that specifically means, truth to be told.

Ratings

1/5 RPG. When the challenge begins, it turns into a board game. Outside of a challenge, it's pretty much nothing.

2/5 Soup Stone. There's some inspiration as to how it could work, but the core of the game is still up to the GM and the group to make up.

0/5 Would I Play. I don't feel like it anymore...

0/5 Would I Write. I feel nothing for its setting, and I'd much rather take what works about this game into something completely new.

3/20 Total Rating

A Modest Life, RPG of retired adventurers

I've been sitting on this one for weeks at this point. Might as well just publish it so I can make a character for it tomorrow.

A Modest Life

"We've done our part in saving the world. It's time for us to rest, and let the younger ones save it next."
Windless Valley, by Kui Lee

Design Notes

This project started when I realized I wouldn't have enough characters for the Character March 2025. Instead of opting for more games I merely helped with writing or reaching for games I didn't even work on at all, I decided on the foolish idea of making a game just so I could make a character for it and compare it among my other games. When I sat down to work on it though, I quickly realized... I don't have any ideas. I asked Kate for some ideas, and she told me she'd like a game about a bunch of retired adventurers, now taking care of a village, resolving simple problems there.

I figured out the boundaries of what I wanted to do and set out to work. For example, early on, I pondered whether magic has a place here, and I didn't make anything magical, nor fantasy humanoids, such as elves, orcs, or dwarves. It's all down to earth, so grounded it's medieval fantasy. The only fantastical elements are the adventurers' competence and the four mythical creatures in the events table.

Players are defined by their age, which defines the sum of their stats (ranging from 1 to 20 each). Whenever they use a stat, they roll 1d20 and try to roll less than the stat.  I went with quick and easy stats, and stat resolution, and tried to keep things minimal overall. This even reached into the combat system, which boils down to "everyone wears down the animal, and then someone tries to slay it with one fell swoop" instead of your typical "let's treat it like a pinata" situation from many other fantasy TTRPGs.

The abilities the player characters get are mostly meant to represent things they'd do as adventurers. I tried to make as many of them as I could useful in general day-to-day stuff too, though here and there I had to resort to doing less. At the moment, I feel pretty good about them.

When it comes to managing the village, there are two main things the players are to aim for: expanding the village by gaining the resource cards through work and protecting the village from animals and mythological creatures by fighting and forgoing the work. The table of events also includes natural dangers that the player might try to resolve, as well as some peaceful events.

Included is a small procedure for working, some medieval buildings, ... and it's a game I suppose. Is it in a perfect state? Not sure. Am I going to publish it on itch.io? Almost certainly, but I doubt I'll get around to that until the end of March. I have some surprises to work on before that.

I hope you enjoyed reading this, and I'd like to wish you all a lovely day!

Character March 2025: Gelt and Sand

Another short system is coming right up. I'll aim to make this one short.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Gelt and Sand

Voltaire Sunside is a member of the Philosopher cast within the society he lives in. Ever since his youth, he had visions of the past, the future, and even the present that he couldn't witness, so his merchant parents got him the best education they could afford. Now it's paying off, since he's one of the many advisors to the colony's ruler. His statistics go as follows:

• Strength +0
• Senses +2
• Smarts +1
• Socializing +0

He's kind of awkward when hanging out in groups, and he's far from a strong man, but his honed perception and intelligence make up for it greatly in the job he has.

Ratings

4/5 RPG. I guess it doesn't feel like a board game, so that's nice.

2/5 Soup Stone. At least it gives you a setting and some things to work off of. If I gave Rolling with It a rating of 2, this one gets a rating of 2 too.

1/5 Would I Play. I haven't watched Dune, so I'm not too invested in this style of game.

0/5 Would I Write. No real interest at the moment. For now it's a thought cabinet material, waiting for its chance to shine.

7/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: These Bloody Cells

This system technically features a character, so why not?

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

These Bloody Cells

Jacque "Sixer" Anderson is a vampire who has been imprisoned for over fifty years. He used to be a crime lord thanks to his charm, but nowadays, the criminal underworld has forgotten him, only considering him an urban myth, a rumor. He's determined to escape now, with some help from the other vampire buddies he made in the prison.

Bite is one of his powers, but another one is Charm and Sneak. His wardens are aware of these, but he's causing them a lot of trouble with these, regardless. His starting Blood pool is 11, though he only contributed 2 points to the Plan pool.

Ratings

4/5 RPG. I think this one could be fun, and it doesn't follow a strict board game structure.

4/5 Soup Stone. I'd say the game gives plenty of inspiration. It's far from perfect, but it's better at this than most of my games.

2/5 Would I Play. Sounds kind of fun in retrospect. I'm not absolutely keen on it, but maybe one day I could give it a go.

2/5 Would I Write. If I have good ideas for it, I could see myself do it.

12/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Arena of Popularity but no Death nor Magic

I didn't publish it on my blog because it felt rather lame in retrospect, but I might as well bring it up now. It's not balanced, it's kind of strange, and it has a comically long name. But it is how I started this whole thing.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Arena of Popularity but no Death nor Magic

The Howler is a wolf-themed warrior. Yes, he bites. Since the rules require a silly 20-word long backstory (thanks, One Punch Man), here it is:

Raised by deer. Ate them. Raised by wolves. Bit them. Raised by humans. Scorned them. Raised himself. Achieved great success.

He starts with 0 Popularity, which is a shock with a backstory this amazing, and his stats are as follows:

• Head 5
• Main Hand 0
• Off Hand 0
• Body 4
• Legs 1

No weapons, no special equipment. Just a wolf mask and sharp teeth.

Ratings

1/5 RPG. Most of it is combat. I don't even know if there's stuff that one could do in between other than manage their popularity and roleplay with no consequence. Unless you'd soup stone it. Speaking of...

1/5 Soup Stone. Again, you get to battle, but not much else, as written.

0/5 Would I Play. No.

0/5 Would I Write. I'd rather start over.

2/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Final: Sole Survivor

Guess I'm killing it with these short articles, huh?

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Final: Sole Survivor

Liam Parker is a local university student and a musclehead too, about to do whatever the group is doing on this oneshot. He's always been a pretty Strong guy, giving him 3 Health instead of 2. His three skills are Hurl, Muscle, and Run. When it comes to his four items, he brought with him his smartphone, his pocket knife that's more for showing than using, a dumbbell, and a pair of shades despite it being evening. He's out to have some fun, chillax with his friends, and show off.

Ratings

5/5 RPG. Checks out.

4/5 Soup Stone. Pretty good selection.

5/5 Would I Play. Absolutely!

2/5 Would I Write. Only if I see good ways to improve it. And I want to see how I could improve it.

16/20 Total Rating

The "Keep on Rolling" Engine

Recently I had an interesting conversation with Cubelith and Izzy, in which I learned about the One Roll Engine. Interesting how they were able to fit both efficiency and speed into one roll. We came up with an alternative, and while they didn't agree to this name, I had to name the article somehow. This is the Keep on Rolling Engine, or KoRE.

Keep on Rolling Engine

Start with stats that have dice assigned to them. Whenever you do something, start by being told which stat you use. Then, you get to decide how many dice you roll. After rolling them, you sum them up to see how effective you are.

If someone wants to counter your action by being faster, they must roll fewer dice than you (or equal if you rolled just one die), and roll a higher sum than yours.

If you are in an intense action sequence, such as a combat or a chase, you might be limited to only having some amount of dice per round. This could pair pretty well with the Opposed Roll Combat System.

Outside of intense action scenes, the players might be able to keep on adding the dice to their rolls until they roll over some difficulty set by the GM. If we want this to matter, there could also be some kind of time limit - the GM could be counting how many dice have been used, and that way keep track of what time it is right now.

What mechanics could we use to make it more than just a dice resolution? Picture the ones listed below being incorporated into various abilities and traits in the game itself.

• Some players could have features that set a minimum rolled value to something (2, 3, or 4, since those are on all standard dice).
• Adding different dice types into the pool.
• Replacing dice with other dice in the pool.
• Static bonuses to a roll (pretty powerful stuff at lower rolls).
• Multiplying select dice rolls? (How could you tell I played Balatro recently?)
• Forgoing a die with a set minimum roll for some specific additional effect.
• Assigning the dice values after the rest of the pool is rolled (Wiggle Dice in O.R.E.).

I'm pretty sure I could keep going, but this is just to record the idea on my blog. Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!

Character March 2025: Everyone Slays the Princess

One of my shortest games. Lightning round!

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Everyone Slays the Princess

Magician. The archetype of someone creative and a thinker. Trying to work out what this place is, who is the Princess, and who is the Hero... What more is there to say?

Ratings

5/5 RPG. Doesn't feel like a board game at all.

2/5 Soup Stone. The premise and some guidelines are there, but largely, it is what you make of it. Not as much as some of my other games, though.

5/5 Would I Play. Short and sweet. Once I figure out more ways to end it, I'd love to play it with groups of new players.

1/5 Would I Write. I consider it finished and complete. If I see something that should be added, I might return to it.

13/20 Total Rating