Character March 2025: Hacks of One Trade

Another short system is coming right up. I'll aim to make this one short.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Hacks of One Trade

Benedict Tryce is one of a group of tailors. Whenever someone needs an article of clothing done from scratch as quickly as possible, these guys will have your back, provided they're not already working on something that day. Mr. Tryce is a brisk worker, which allows him to add +1 to any increases of Progress. That's how they can get their work done so quickly. Their goal is to become the best tailor troupe in town and the most stylish one day, too.

Ratings

1/5 RPG. Like most of my 200-word experiments, this one is more of a system test than a roleplaying game with options outside of a minigame.

1/5 Soup Stone. Crafting is done, but what about the rest of it?

1/5 Would I Play. Maybe? I'm not particularly motivated to play it, seeing how it's just a crafting minigame with some player options slapped on. But if I actually needed it, it's nice to have this system around.

1/5 Would I Write. For now, this is one of those ideas waiting in my brain cabinet to be uncovered when the need for it arises. Until then, I don't really feel a need to work on it.

4/20 Total Rating

Characters March 2025: Play It by Cheer!

Those of you who know where to see my releases might be wondering why I skipped Gon' Click. Well, in retrospect, you can't really make a character for that game. Sure, I could write up a description and all that, but at the end of the day, there's no mechanical substance that would make them different from other characters. This might complicate my challenge a little, seeing how I have roughly 30 TTRPGs out there, and not all of them might include some character creation rules. I'll worry about resolving that at the end of the month.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Play It by Cheer!

Scarlet Matters is a guitarist in the girl pop band called Peak Chic and the Babes. Let's first talk about her qualities and what they represent.

• Tempo 13. She can act really fast, but she has a hard time being careful.
• Intensity 12. She can be quite forceful and loud, but she has a hard time being subtle or unseen.
• Authenticity 7. She can raise people's spirits easily, but she has a harder time being empathetic to their troubles.
• Creativity 6. Her methods are simple and straightforward instead of unconventional.

She has good relationships with her band members. The keyboard player could be way more creative, the drummer could be even more intense, and the singer could be quite authentic, though all this depends on the other players.

Ratings

2/5 RPG. There was a music band system. It worked, kind of. Not sure if I'd say it was good, or much of an RPG on its own.

1/5 Soup Stone. It doesn't even have a core resolution mechanic written beyond the words "Use common sense". It's been almost two years, and I forgot what I meant - was the core resolution the same as rolling for the musical performance? Perhaps it was. At least the music playing was sorted out already.

0/5 Would I Play. Did you see that dice-rolling mechanic?? Roll d6+d12 and d8+d10, and keep the sum further from 10. That alone feels like it would take forever to get used to, and you'd have to do that a lot.

0/5 Would I Write. I already did. This system has been reworked and included in the Runehack RPG as the Seeker minigame. This was a fine start and an introduction of a cool probability curve I had never thought possible, but at the same time, that dice-rolling mechanic was really impractical, and the Qualities took me some time to fix. Not sure if I'll ever publish the newer music game as a standalone.

3/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Double the Zombies

Another day, another game to make a character for. This time, it's time to Double the Zombies.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Double the Zombies

My character for this game used to be a criminal before the society's collapse. That's why he's got a gun on him, along with ten bullets for it, and a sizeable pocket knife. His final mundane item is his Swiss army knife that he got from his father. His stats would be like this:

• forcefully +3
• subtly +4
• quickly +2
• carefully +1
• boldly +0
• cleverly +0

His goal is to survive. Hopefully, nobody will ever learns about his criminal past, especially once he starts caring about the people around him.

Ratings

4/5 RPG. I haven't played it yet, but I feel like the doubling of zombies gimmick might lead to some fights that would keep dragging on and on. That's why I give it a rating of 4.

1/5 Soup Stone. You'll need to make up the vast majority of stuff for this game to work.

2/5 Would I Play. I could imagine giving it a try one day if I expanded the rules.

1/5 Would I Write. Maybe? But right now I'm not feeling it at all.

8/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: (Almost) Everyone is Harry

Let's continue this series with a quick entry from the year when I committed myself to writing a game every month. Except this game came before I knew I'd challenge myself like that.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

(Almost) Everyone is Harry

This game features three types of players: the Game Master, the Detective, and the Voices in his head. Your goal is to solve a crime together despite your amnesia. I'm going to assume that I'll be a pair of voices inside of the detective's head, seeing how that will be the role of most players.

The number I'll choose for these two voices to share is 5. Sonder is a hunch you have for other people's lives. It allows you to guess what their job is, whether they have a family, what kinds of songs they like, and so on. It's not based on perceptions, at least not on the kind you'd be aware of. The other voice, much weaker than Sonder, is Attriage, your control over the emotions you feel for others. The original rules didn't say that the two voices have to be related, but I figured I'd try to connect them. It makes sense here - the better you know others, the harder time you'll have not feeling for them.

Ratings

3/5 RPG. Some important details are missing, but it's pretty clear this ain't a board game.

1/5 Soup Stone. Make up the characters. Make up the detective. Make up the crime. Make up the world. Make up the NPCs. A ton of work. You have to make up pretty much everything, save for the premise and the body hanging from a tree (and even that feels rather shallow).

1/5 Would I Play. It could be fun, but I'm not exactly driven to do it.

1/5 Would I Write. This was an experiment on my part. It's an okay premise, but if I were to return to it, it would be independent of franchises and maybe with more mechanics for how the voices could interact with each other, also giving each player maybe just one voice and figuring out another way to balance them. It's an okay start, but I don't feel like developing it more anytime soon.

6/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Fae King

Continuing in this month's challenge, here's the second article on my most recent game, the Fae King.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Fae King

I won't talk much about this game since it's fairly recent. Let's cut to the chase and get to the character.

Janette Swift is a mortal who wants to kill the Fae King to bring her husband back from the dead. Perhaps she's a model, fighting the fae on their home field of beauty. So her twelve spaces of adjectives are:

• Way Fair er
• Keen er
• Quick
• Prim
• Shrewd
• Smooth er
• Thin ner

Losing these would be tragic for her, but it would be worth it for her ultimate goal.

Ratings

2/5 RPG. Courting Phase gives opportunities for roleplaying. But outside of that, it's largely a game bound by its rules. This is what it takes to build the house of cards, this is what happens when you're being chased, and nothing happens when you're not in Elfame because it's not included in the rules.

4/5 Soup Stone. You still need to come up with the problems that the fae have, but other than that the three pages of rules give you plenty of stuff to work with.

2/5 Would I Play. This game was largely made for the game jam within a single week. It's okay, but I can't say it's something that actively entices me to give it a try.

2/5 Would I write. Right now, it's way too recent for me to delve into it in a useful way. Maybe after I let this project rest for a bit, I could do it.

11/20 Total Rating

Character March 2025: Clues and Hunches

This is a game I already reworked once. The older version of the game was published on this blog in March of 2023, and it was a decent starting point. I won't deal with that, though. Let's see how I will do with the newer version of the game.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Clues and Hunches

Miss Ponsible, first name Iris, is a private investigator with a strange power of reverting time a couple of seconds back. This gives her an edge in her investigations, allowing her to make daring moves and maneuvers without others knowing anything about them. That being said, her only domain of specialization is in psychology. At least she has a friend on her phone, Theodore, who knows a lot about culture. That being said, the one thing she can rely on the most is her intuition, represented by the six points of Hunch.

Ratings

5/5 RPG. Barely anything about this feels like a board game. One could argue it's comparable to telling someone a puzzle, but I still think that roleplaying it makes it feel different.

2/5 Soup Stone. The system gives you a decent set of special powers, a way to progress your character, example domains, and guidelines for GM preparation. That being said, the GM will have a lot of prep ahead of them, and they'll have to stay on guard throughout the game in case the players pull off something unexpected.

5/5 Would I Play. I am working on a oneshot with this system, so that's a yes.

4/5 Would I Write. If I get decent ideas and won't have anything higher up on my priorities list, I would.

16/20 Total Rating

Characters March 2025: Deviants

New month, new challenge. This time, I decided to go through the TTRPG Character Creation Jam. The goal of this jam is to create 31 characters throughout March. I will revisit games I made, make characters for them, and rate them with my current point of view on them. I'm gonna put little effort into these articles, since there's likely gonna be 31 of them.

My ratings will be done on four scales, each ranging from 1 to 5:

• RPG: How much does this feel like an RPG to me, as opposed to a board game?
• Soup Stone: How little content does the game expect you to add? For this scale, 0 is a complete Soup Stone since I'd like to sum the scores to see the game's total score.
• Would I Play: If I were given a chance to, would I play this game?
• Would I Write: If I were inspired enough and had time/energy for it, would I get back to working on this game?

Deviants

My first proper TTRPG. Deviants was based on a simple premise, playing superpowered people in a modern setting. It was very inspired by Prototype and inFamous, and I believe it holds up well enough.

My character grew up in a big city where the game takes place. He's a grounded person who doesn't overuse his powers too much, but he uses them for good. He probably hides them and tries to live a normal life for the most part. His powers allow him to manipulate Neodynium, which is why he purchased a whole set of Neodynium magnets and made a cool weapon out of them. I'm imagining something akin to the Buster Sword that can split into several floating parts he can telekinetically manipulate. Though I'm not sure if he'd be that violent. As for his name, Drew Near.

Ratings

5/5 RPG. No arguing with this; it's quite a freeform game.

1/5 Soup Stone. That being said, the only thing the game gives you beyond the core resolution mechanics-wise is the system for injuries. Anything beyond that would have to be added to the game.

3/5 Would I Play. I could go with this if I needed to run a quick game with very little player-side prep. However, I'm afraid the GM need to prepare a lot more.

4/5 Would I Write. I don't have ideas as to how I could expand the system or whether it even needs expanding. But yes, if I had everything necessary for an update, I would be very willing to republish this game as a better product.

13/20 Total Rating

Fae King

Got challenged to partake in a game jam, so I decided to give it a go. There's just one problem: the theme for this game jam was to make a hack of a game that was released before the year 2000. I don't really care for the games released before the year 2000. I am very unfamiliar with them. The only ones that I know (and even then, I only know about them) are games that do something weird, like Amber Diceless. After I remembered that Puppetland was released in 1993, I made up my mind. I was going to work on the system I wanted to publish in April 2023 as a 200-word RPG. Back then, I got stuck on a problem or two and later got a better idea for a different 200-word game. The time has come to pull this one out of the thought cabinet and make it happen.

Taking Names

One of the aspects I didn't recall or appreciate about Puppetland before is its system for "attributes", or rather "what your character can and can't do". It's kind of easy to miss with the rules for how the game could be played and all being so much more prominent. If you are to play a game in which anything you say is spoken by your character, you can't rely on numbers to say how good you are at this or that. But I wanted to develop it a bit beyond to keep it thematically related.

Instead of doodling your own character and crossing out parts of it, I chose to represent a character just with their titles, split up into syllables. Well, okay, technically "-er" isn't a syllable, but I don't mind. What I really like about this is just how fluently it can be used in the game where anything spoken is crucial.

"What a wonderful game of tag, Miss Everyoung! I see now that you are Quicker than I am, so it's rather difficult to compete with you."

A character's proper name is there as a buffer that the players can cross out at any point in time without losing their character's efficiency. Though it should reflect what others call them in the game.

Fae Cant

Back when I wanted to write this game nearly two years ago, I had two possible names for it: Fae Cant, or To Kill a Fae. I liked the sound of both of them but for this one... I figured the best name is Fae King due to the pun involved. Fae Cant is just as good though, truth to be told.

The original game's premise was killing the fae using the Traditions, which to them would be seen as laws of the society. The biggest problem was that I couldn't identify a reason for this. Why would the players want to enter this realm and just kill the fae?

Nearly two years later, I gave it some more thought, and I figured it could be about killing one specific fae. Taking a hint of inspiration from the Heart, I decided that the players would try to kill the Fae King to get their wish fulfilled. From that point on, things were a lot simpler.

• Why does the game last one hour? Because that's how long they're visiting the Elfame (land of fae according to some myth in our world) last.
• Why would the fae not do something about it? Because fae have a hard time distinguishing between the mortals and themselves. Why is that? Because mortals don't visit this realm.
• Why can the players just kill any fae? Because they will reincarnate in a bit, death is merely an inconvenience to them.
• Why would the fae want to kill the players too? Because a fae can get their wish fulfilled by absorbing a mortal's soul.

A House of Cards

The pure game of Puppetland doesn't include randomness, or any gamism really. It's a narrativistic experience. I wanted a little more meat on those bones, so I added a deck of cards into the game. To be allowed within the Fae King's vicinity, players must gain the trust of enough fae by helping them out. They must build up a four-story house of cards, which requires 26 cards. Since each assistance grants the players a pair of cards, they can build this up by helping the fae 13 times. Perhaps by playing this game quickly enough, this could be done in a single sitting, perhaps it could be done faster. I don't know.

After the players kill the Fae King, or the house of cards falls, the Hunting phase begins. The fae know who the mortals are, and they will seek them mercilessly. I will admit, I'm not sure if this is such a good way to play the game or not. It's just the best I could come up with in the couple of days that I had to make this game. I'm calling it good enough.

That's everything I consider noteworthy about the game. I don't feel like publishing this on my itch.io page, at least not yet. Yes, I'm counting this towards my New Year's resolution, that's another Thing finished. Believe it or not, I'm at eight out of 12 to 25 Things as of writing this article. At this rate, maybe I could finish even 52 Things this year, just as I briefly considered in my Review of 2024 article.

Thank you for reading, and have a nice day!

P.S.: If you haven't, please check out my latest youtube video, it's about time loops!